![mac paint pot painterly vs camel coat mac paint pot painterly vs camel coat](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BSo02RDEtTo/Ui6mSD0fYZI/AAAAAAAAZFU/UM6zv66asMk/s1600/mac+prolongwear+paintpots+eye+makeup+indian+darker+skin+beauty+blog+swatches.jpg)
They were best applied in thin layers and built up, but the results were inconsistent and varied a lot between shades. The shimmery finish, particularly more pearlescent/metallic, were significantly more emollient than the matte shades, and this led to sheerer coverage that often applied unevenly and was difficult to apply with precision. The matte shades were typically semi-opaque to opaque in coverage and longer-wearing-12 to 14 hours before showing a bit of fading-but were varying degrees of blendable (related to how creamy the initial texture was). The matte shades were lightly creamy to slightly stiffer to work with, and with the stiffer ones, I preferred using a brush to get the initial product out of the jar and then use a fingertip to furiously diffuse the product. The matte finish is most consistent in performance and tended to perform better than the shades with some level of shimmer. We don't want to setĮxpectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end upīeing reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding! Comments on this post are closed.The formula is supposed to be "highly pigmented, long-wearing, blendable" and can be used as either an "eye primer" or as a "cream shadow." The brand says it's supposed to wear for "24 hours" without flaking or creasing. We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/whenĪ review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. Will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed). Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post aboveįor more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn'tĪnswered already. Off-topic question, or need technical support, please
![mac paint pot painterly vs camel coat mac paint pot painterly vs camel coat](http://www.makeupandbeautyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/mac-paint-pots-and-trax-890.jpg)
Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to
#Mac paint pot painterly vs camel coat pro#
It’s creamy with just the right amount of slip to make for quick and easy blending and application, but it still dries down and sets without ever gathering in the creases.įYI: the ingredient list for the Pro Longwear Paint Pots is the same as for the regular Paint Pots when I compared against the list for Bare Study/Constructivist! It’s off by one ingredient when compared to the Paint Pots from Posh Paradise. This is the kind of consistency and quality that made Paint Pots my go-to base for years (and more to the point, what made them so popular when they originally debuted). It was nicely pigmented, incredibly blendable, and applied beautifully–smoothly, evenly, and wore all day long without fading or creasing. Of the seven shades ( Let Me Pop! wasn’t available for purchase when I bought these, but since there wasn’t a noticeable difference between these and when they originally debuted, you can see a swatch here), Vintage Selection was by far the best performer. bareMinerals Libation is very similar but a powder product.
#Mac paint pot painterly vs camel coat mac#
MAC Vintage Selection Pro Longwear Paint Pot ($18.50 for 0.17 oz.) is described as a “frosted dirty peach.” It’s a subtly, warm-toned, lightened brown with a slightly frosted, champagne sheen. MAC Vintage Selection Pro Longwear Paint Pot